<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: IE9 vs Chrome 6</title> <atom:link href="http://blog.ajaxmasters.com/ie9-vs-chrome-6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://blog.ajaxmasters.com/ie9-vs-chrome-6/</link> <description>Just another WordPress weblog</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 10:33:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: hot</title><link>http://blog.ajaxmasters.com/ie9-vs-chrome-6/comment-page-1/#comment-9641</link> <dc:creator>hot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 05:09:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajaxmasters.com/?p=392#comment-9641</guid> <description>if other browsers doesn&#039;t have hardware acceleration, it&#039;s not actually Microsoft fault. Those browser vendors were bragging a lot about speed, open standards, performance. Now Microsoft has replied in the same language pretty well.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if other browsers doesn&#8217;t have hardware acceleration, it&#8217;s not actually Microsoft fault. Those browser vendors were bragging a lot about speed, open standards, performance. Now Microsoft has replied in the same language pretty well.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 297/302 objects using disk: basic

Served from: blog.ajaxmasters.com @ 2012-02-05 06:44:36 -->
